[ngw] next release of GW

[Joseph Marton]

If the server is used for GW, correct.  But we don't know that.  We just
know it's OES2.  It could be handling other services as well.  The more OES2
services running on it, the more difficult it is to just rebuild the server.

Joe

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Keith Larson <klarson at k12group.net> wrote:

>  but with Groupwise trustee rights don't really apply.
>
>
> Keith Larson
> Franklin Computer Services - K12 Group
> (614) 561-4887
> klarson at k12group.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> Joseph Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> 4/14/2010 10:44 AM >>>
>
> You could probably get the data migrated that way but I'm not sure what
> will happen to trustees since you'd still have to remove the server from the
> tree and reinstall OES2. Best solution is to use new hardware and the
> transfer ID feature but Mary said no new hardware is coming.
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Simon Shilton <
> Simon.Shilton at acustica.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>  I am no expert on NSS on OES2, but my understanding is that NSS
>> partitions/volumes are to be on separate partitions/LUNS/disks from the
>> Linux system, and that it is possible to mount NW NSS volumes on a Linux
>> server.....
>>  so, would it be possible to hose the 32bit OES2 Linux system, install
>> the 64bit OES in the same space, and mount the NSS volumes?
>> or is this just a disaster waiting to happen?
>>  Simon
>>
>>
>> >>> On 14 April 2010 at 15:26, in message <
>> j2x859ece291004140726t4126ac6ap6a07b13119f34560 at mail.gmail.com>, Joseph
>> Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    In-place from 32- to 64-bit? Probably not going to happen.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mary Matthews <mlm23 at calvin.edu> wrote:
>> > I need an in-place upgrade method for going from 32-bit to 64-bit SLES
>> and OES2
>> > using NSS. We won't be buying new hardware and my downtime window for GW
>> is
>> > limited to the day after Christmas. Not enough time for a wipe,
>> reinstall, and
>> > restore process for 5 servers.
>> >
>> >>>> Danita Zanre <dzanre.ngwlist at gmail.com> 4/13/2010 8:39 AM >>>
>> > Personally my only annoyance in this is that I rebuilt my own GW system
>> VM
>> > in January and left it at 32 bit SLES 11. So now I'll have to redo it
>> again
>> > <g>.
>> >
>> > Danita
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Neil Stansbury <
>> > neil.stansbury at redbacksystems.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > Ascot will be 64-bit ONLY. We are talking about servers/agents.
>> >> This is also great and IMO shows Novell's long term commitment to GW.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> > Danita Zanrè
>> > Keep in touch!
>> > http://www.twitter.com/GWGoddess
>> > http://www.facebook.com/Caledonia.net
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/danitazanre
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ngw mailing list
>> > ngw at ngwlist.com
>> > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> ngw mailing list
>> ngw at ngwlist.com
>> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ngw mailing list
>> ngw at ngwlist.com
>> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ngwlist.com/pipermail/ngw/attachments/20100414/d21a4e56/attachment.html