[ngw] OT: Fax Over IP

Joseph Marton jmmarton at gmail.com
Fri Apr 23 22:30:02 UTC 2010


Hmmm...

" *Inexpensive:* $10/m includes 100 sent & 200 received pages."

I'm usually not a big fan of hosted stuff, but for as little faxing as we do
it's worth considering.  I just have to go through our logs to see how much
faxing we do.  Thanks for the suggestion!

Joe

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Chris Williams <
Chris.Williams at messagingarchitects.com> wrote:

>  If you aren't set on having something in-house, have you considered
> something like MyFax?
>
> With it you can fax straight from email. We have several GW accounts set
> up. Users simply proxy in, and send an email with attachment, and it shows
> up on the other end as a fax. Faxes are received into an email account as
> well. Of course, most of our faxes are produced on computer, so attaching is
> a simple matter. Users scan any hard copy docs they need using a network
> scanner.
>
> It has worked well for us for months now.
>
> Chris
>
>
> >>> On 4/23/2010 at 2:26 PM, "Steve Utick" <sutick at co.lewis-clark.mt.us>
> wrote:
>    We spent most of our time working on the account codes, as without that
> it was unusable for us.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Steve Utick
> Infrastructure Center Supervisor
> Lewis & Clark County
> 316 N. Park - Room 211
> Helena, MT  59623
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>
> >>> Joseph Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> 4/23/2010 2:12 PM >>>
> Luckily we don't use account codes for LD so that shouldn't be an
> issue.  Outside of that did the system seem to work ok or did you
> spend most of your time working on the account codes issue?
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Steve Utick
> <sutick at co.lewis-clark.mt.us> wrote:
> > We tried it here, but ran into some issues.   We use long distance codes
> that the user has to enter after they dial any long distance number, but the
> FOIP systems couldn't handle it.
> >
> > Spent quite a while with Imecom and Biscom trying to get it working and
> finally gave up.   So, we bought new boards.....
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Steve Utick
> > Infrastructure Center Supervisor
> > Lewis & Clark County
> > 316 N. Park - Room 211
> > Helena, MT  59623
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >>>> Joseph Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> 4/23/2010 1:58 PM >>>
> > Is anyone here using a Fax Over IP system?  We're contemplating it,
> > possibly thinking about going with a solution from Imecom.  I'm just
> > curious if anyone is using that or possibly any other FoIP system,
> > especially if it's integrated with a VoIP PBX.  I just want to avoid
> > messing with modems or fax boards and ideally I'd like to virtualize
> > the fax server.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Joe
> > _______________________________________________
> > ngw mailing list
> > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ngw mailing list
> > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist..com/mailman/listinfo/ngw<http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>
>
>
> Considering a Migration to GroupWise 8 or Exchange?
> Learn more at http://www.messagingarchitects.com/webcasts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ngwlist.com/pipermail/ngw/attachments/20100423/0bab0f3c/attachment.html 


More information about the ngw mailing list