[ngw] Antw: GW in Vm environment
Thomas Stimper
tstimper at nmedv.de
Wed Jul 5 15:17:59 UTC 2017
Agree, if i had storage integrated Veeam snapshoots which takes only
some seconds
than its ok to stop the agents for the time of the snapshoot. Users
will not see
any downtime.
If i had "normal" snapshots than the agents would be down for at least
the time which
it takes to backup the ctk file of the vm which can be minutes or
hours.
For such an enviroment the agents cannot be taken down. Thats why i do
a second dbcopy
backup.
(or use SEP sesam or other backup software which can do a TSA related
backup)
Thomas
Thomas Stimper
MCNE
Micro Focus Premier Solution Partner
---------------------------------------------------
neue medien edv-systeme gmbh
Zwickauer Str. 224
09116 Chemnitz
Germany
Email tstimper at nmedv.de
Tel. +49 371 8448890
Fax +49 371 8448891
Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 12552
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Stimper
USt.ID DE176096756
www.nmedv.de
>>> Joseph Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> 05.07.2017 13:35 >>>
If you use the process of stopping the agents right before the snapshot
is
taken and starting them up right after, then you have a good backup of
the
GW databases within the snapshot. You can still use dbcopy to create a
GW
restore area, but you won't need the additional copy simply to insure
you
have a good, consistent backup.
Joe
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Stimper <tstimper at nmedv.de>
wrote:
> >I would not use independent disks at all.
>
> Agree. We normaly use snapshot backups for GroupWise vm's.
>
> But we always make a second backup by dbcopy and we use this as
restore
> area.
> So we always have a good baclup of the GroupWise db's itself.
>
> Thomas
>
> Thomas Stimper
>
> MCNE
> Micro Focus Premier Solution Partner
> ---------------------------------------------------
> neue medien edv-systeme gmbh
> Zwickauer Str. 224
> 09116 Chemnitz
> Germany
> Email tstimper at nmedv.de
> Tel. +49 371 8448890
> Fax +49 371 8448891
> Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 12552
> Geschäftsführer: Thomas Stimper
> USt.ID DE176096756
> www.nmedv.de
>
>
> >>> Joseph Marton <jmmarton at gmail.com> 04.07.2017 17:56 >>>
> I would not use independent disks at all.
>
> Joe
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Gregg A. Hinchman <
> Gregg at hinchmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I assume you mean they do not want to do Independent/Persistent
> right
> > Joe? They would not want to do Dependent.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Take Care.
> >
> > Gregg A. Hinchman, PMP
> >
> > Salesforce Certified Administrator
> >
> > Salesforce Certified App Builder
> >
> > Salesforce Certified Advanced Administrator
> >
> >
> > Gregg at HinchmanConsulting.com
> >
> > www.HinchmanConsulting.com
> >
> > 765.653.8099
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Courage is doing what is right."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >>>
> > From: Joseph Marton<jmmarton at gmail.com>
> > To:NGWList<ngw at ngwlist.com>
> > Date: 7/4/2017 11:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ngw] Antw: GW in Vm environment
> >
> >
> > You probably don't want to do independent disks. Those disks
aren't
> >
> > included in snapshots, and snapshots are useful for many things
such
> as
> >
> > preparing for upgrades or even for regular backups. Keep in mind
I
> work
> >
> > for Veeam, but regardless, there are various backup solutions
which
> use
> >
> > VMware snapshots. That shouldn't be a concern for things such as
GW
> or
> >
> > eDir as there are ways to address these applications, such as
> shutting down
> >
> > the POA before taking the snapshot and firing it back up as soon
as
> the
> >
> > snapshot is taken. I actually wrote about this in a Cool
Solutions
> article
> >
> > a little ways back.
> >
> >
> >
> > https://www.novell.com/communities/coolsolutions/
> > veeam-adds-oes-2015-support/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Thys de Beer <Thys at nwpg.gov.za>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > HI Thomas,
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanx ... so you say no Independent? , not for OS nor for gw
data
> >
> > > disk?... not planning to restore VM, but one never knows right,
but
> i
> >
> > > can't think it will be days before i restore if i ever do?.. but
> will
> >
> > > this always be an issue even few hours donw the line
> >
> > >
> >
> > > That's why i wondered because i see that for Independant -
> Persistent
> >
> > > disk changes are immediate and written to disk, and they are not
> >
> > > effected by snaphosts?..
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I want to have this right, don't want to hear
afterwards...oooooo
> shoot
> >
> > > you should have done this or that on the disks...
> >
> > >
> >
> > > 10% on the read cache .. so on my 1.2tb po data disk i do
> 120gb?...
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Kind Regards,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thys de Beer
> >
> > > NWPG Office of the Premier
> >
> > > GITO: Infrastructure
> >
> > > Deputy Dir: Server Administration
> > > http://www.waytag.com/!ThysdeBeer.tag
> >
> >
> >
> > > 018 388 3828
> >
> > > ------------------
> >
> > > Novell -- CNE
> >
> > > Microsoft -- MCITP- Enterprise Administrator
> >
> > > Microsoft -- MCSE- Private Cloud
> >
> > > Vmware -- VCP5
> >
> > > Cobit5
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >>> "Thomas Stimper" <tstimper at nmedv.de> 2017/07/04 12:40 PM >>>
> >
> > > Hi Thys,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >1. Disks should i do "Independent" / "Independent -Persistent"
or
> >
> > > "Independent - Non-Persistent" .. sorry about this i just want
to
> be
> >
> > > sure .. heard horrible things about snaphosts and edir
> >
> > > do not do any Independent, but i would not put e eDir replica on
> this
> >
> > > servers if you plan to restore the VM from days ago.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >2. Then also it t
> alks about "Sharing"? ... "no=sharing" or
> >
> > > "multi-writer" or " unspecified" this is all new.. remember
this
> is
> >
> > > in
> >
> > > a vSAN all flash setup for storage..if it matters....
> >
> > > No sharing, if you do not want to build a OES cluster whithin
> Vmware
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >3. "Virtual flash read Cache"? .. do i enable? and how big do i
> make
> >
> > > this? 4Gb 8GB 10 or nothing?..
> >
> > > yes, enable, i configure 10% of the actual data on the VMdisk.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Best regards
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thomas
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thomas Stimper
> >
> > >
> >
> > > MCNE
> >
> > > Micro Focus Premier Solution Partner
> >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > neue medien edv-systeme gmbh
> >
> > > Zwickauer Str. 224
> >
> > > 09116 Chemnitz
> >
> > > Germany
> >
> > > Email tstimper at nmedv.de
> >
> > > Tel. +49 371 8448890
> >
> > > Fax +49 371 8448891
> >
> > > Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 12552
> >
> > > Geschäftsführer: Thomas Stimper
> >
> > > USt.ID DE176096756
> >
> > > www.nmedv.de
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >>> "Thys de Beer" <Thys at nwpg.gov.za> 04.07.2017 09:58 >>>
> >
> > > HI All,
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Ok we have a new vce/dell vxrail setup, vsan the whole thing ..
so
> now
> >
> > > my first time for GW and oes/edir for that matter .. when i try
to
> >
> > > create here are some new questions (not had this before on my
> small
> >
> > > esxi
> >
> > > hosts before ..what do i select?for now gw2012, will upgrade to
> gw2014
> >
> > > once on new solution
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > A few questions on VM creations... vCentre vxrails ..... and
this
> an
> >
> > > All flash solution,,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > For my normal OES/Linux boxes .. i know filr specify some these
> >
> > > following questions but for my sles/oes/gw boxes what do i do?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > 1. Disks should i do "Independent" / "Independent -Persistent"
or
> >
> > > "Independent - Non-Persistent" .. sorry about this i just want
to
> be
> >
> > > sure .. heard horrible things about snaphosts and edir
> >
> >
>
> >
> > > 2. Then also it talks about "Sharing"? ... "no=sharing" or
> >
> > > "multi-writer" or " unspecified" this is all new.. remember
this
> is
> >
> > > in
> >
> > > a vSAN all flash setup for storage..if it matters....
> >
> > >
> >
> > > 3. "Virtual flash read Cache"? .. do i enable? and how big do i
> make
> >
> > > this? 4Gb 8GB 10 or nothing?..
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Kind Regards,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thys de Beer
> >
> > > NWPG Office of the Premier
> >
> > > GITO: Infrastructure
> >
> > > Deputy Dir: Server Administration
> > > http://www.waytag.com/!ThysdeBeer.tag
> >
> >
> >
> > > 018 388 3828
> >
> > > ------------------
> >
> > > Novell -- CNE
> >
> > > Microsoft -- MCITP- Enterprise Administrator
> >
> > > Microsoft -- MCSE- Private Cloud
> >
> > > Vmware -- VCP5
> >
> > > Cobit5
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Disclaimer
> >
> > > "This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
> information
> >
> > > which is confidential, private or privilege in nature and it is
> for
> >
> > > the
> >
> > > sole use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are
not
> the
> >
> > > intended recipient, you must immediately notify the sender via
> >
> > > electronic mail and further refrain from reading, disseminating,
> >
> > > distributing, copying or using this message or any of its
> transmitted
> >
> > > files. Any views of this message and its transmitted files are
> those
> >
> > > of
> >
> > > the sender unless the sender specifically states such views to
be
> >
> > > those
> >
> > > of the North-West Provincial Government. Though this message and
> its
> >
> > > transmitted files have been swept for the presence of computer
> >
> > > viruses,
> >
> > > the North-West Provincial Government accepts no liability
> whatsoever
> >
> > > for
> >
> > > any loss, damage or expenses resulting directly or indirectly
from
> the
> >
> > > use or access of this message or any of its transmitted files."
> >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > > ngw mailing list
> >
> > > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Disclaimer
> >
> > > "This e-mail and any files tran
> smitted with it may contain
> information
> >
> > > which is confidential, private or privilege in nature and it is
for
> the
> >
> > > sole use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are
not
> the
> >
> > > intended recipient, you must immediately notify the sender via
> electronic
> >
> > > mail and further refrain from reading, disseminating,
> distributing,
> > copying
> >
> > > or using this message or any of its transmitted files. Any views
of
> this
> >
> > > message and its transmitted files are those of the sender unless
> the
> > sender
> >
> > > specifically states such views to be those of the North-West
> Provincial
> >
> > > Government. Though this message and its transmitted files have
been
> swept
> >
> > > for the presence of computer viruses, the North-West Provincial
> > Government
> >
> > > accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss, damage or expenses
> > resulting
> >
> > > directly or indirectly from the use or access of this message or
> any of
> > its
> >
> > > transmitted files."
> >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > > ngw mailing list
> >
> > > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > ngw mailing list
> >
> > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> > _______________________________________________
> > ngw mailing list
> > ngw at ngwlist.com
> > http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>
> __________________________
_____________________
> ngw mailing list
> ngw at ngwlist.com
> http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
>
_______________________________________________
ngw mailing list
ngw at ngwlist.com
http://ngwlist.com/mailman/listinfo/ngw
More information about the ngw
mailing list